Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2005, 10:10 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default Re: Going broke hand???

[ QUOTE ]
Being weak is good in this case. Only very weak hands will pay you off, so you have to appear weak. There is no straight or flush possible and at MOST villain has 4 outs to a gutshot if hes behind. So you give up almost no equity checking.

I think if you stop and take a few minutes to think about what villain could given this specific flop texture, checking behind is the best play - you maximize gains from weak hands and minimize losses to monsters.

Unless its been a few orbits and villain has like a 70% vpip or something, in that case just shove it in I guess.

On the other hand, if theres legitimate straight and flush draws out there, then yeah, I think you have to show strength and go broke.

edit: woops, thought positions were reversed. This situation sucks a lot more then, I think arguments still apply though.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you play weak you encourage much weaker hand sto bluff you. Top two pair on a dry board is a solid hand that I will need a lock solid read before I am folding.

Don't ever play weak, all you do is allow worse players to move you off hands. At these levels ABC is the most +EV way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.