#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is more rake on party worth the worse players?
at the 1/2 to 3/6 6-max level, is the extra rake on party compared to say stars worth it in relation to the extra bad players on party?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is more rake on party worth the worse players?
what do your PT stats say? I vote yes.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is more rake on party worth the worse players?
LOL i just posted the EXACT same post 2 minutes ago in the bonus section: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...e=0#Post3921695
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is more rake on party worth the worse players?
PT stats is the best way to compare both. Is there anybody with a lot of hands on both Stars and Party and is willing to post the stats?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is more rake on party worth the worse players?
Party because:
a) the bonuses used to more than make up for the rake difference b) you can data mine at Party so never have to sit down cold to a table c) players at Party are worse |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is more rake on party worth the worse players?
you should also consider that since you play far less hands than your opponents, if you are getting rakeback you will be considered to have paid more rake than you actually paid.
|
|
|