#1
|
|||
|
|||
Standard deviation at 6 max
What is your standard deviation in 6 max games?...as measured by BB / 100 hands as listed in PT.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
35PTBB/100 so 70BB
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
Does pokertracker provide that number?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
Yes, under Session tab ("more detail").
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
38bb
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
Recently though I've been playing more like a 25/15 type game and my variance has gone up a bit but it'll take a while for the stats to catch up as its a fairly big DB. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
Mine is almost EXACTLY the same as yours Beset, though this is just my new DB on my work laptop and doesn't have a crapload of hands.
Curious, what do your Poker Tracker Omaha numbers look like? My SD/100 was a little lower then my Hold'em numbers which kinda suprised me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
[ QUOTE ]
Mine is almost EXACTLY the same as yours Beset, though this is just my new DB on my work laptop and doesn't have a crapload of hands. Curious, what do your Poker Tracker Omaha numbers look like? My SD/100 was a little lower then my Hold'em numbers which kinda suprised me. [/ QUOTE ] In split-pot games variance is lower so SD will be lower as well. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
I was talking about Pot-Limit Omaha, not Hi/lo. PLO has a TON of variance.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
[ QUOTE ]
35PTBB/100 so 70BB [/ QUOTE ] same here... somehow, after 15k hands of 6-max i find my standard deviation there to be lower than full ring. |
|
|