Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2005, 09:00 AM
pokernicus pokernicus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 47
Default Re: NYTimes Editorial

Very nice and well articulated letter! I also disliked the article.

It's amazing what misconceptions exist about poker. I think in most peoples' minds, poker is equated to other forms of gambling like blackjack, craps, etc. Therefore, many people erroneously believe that if you are a poker enthusiast, then you're a gambler (or have a gambling problem). And that's generally not true (though many high-profile players do engage in other forms of gambling).

I think people fail to realize 1) that it's possible to have an edge in poker, and 2) the amount of ability required to be a succesful player.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-2005, 10:47 AM
mshalen mshalen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 107
Default Re: NYTimes Editorial

The article was correct in describing the popularity of holdem being played at bar mitzvahs. My daughter is now attending at least one event per weekend and has been to a number of partys with holdem.

At the end of the night the kids use their chips to buy small gift/party favor types of stuff. My daughter (thanks to her dads great parenting skills) has been coming home with DVDs, CDs, movie tickets and assorted other crap every time she goes. She said the boys are easy to beat and are a bunch of fish because they assume a girl doesn't know how to play and they think she just got lucky.

I love my daughter and I am very glad she got her moms brains and looks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:15 PM
AceHigh AceHigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,173
Default Re: NYTimes Editorial

[ QUOTE ]
She said the boys are easy to beat and are a bunch of fish because they assume a girl doesn't know how to play and they think she just got lucky.

[/ QUOTE ]

For some reason losing poker players always think the winner, "just got lucky", it has nothing to do with her being female.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2005, 03:12 PM
chessforlife chessforlife is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USS George washington, Virgina, 7 months until Los Angeles
Posts: 32
Default Re: NYTimes Editorial

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
She said the boys are easy to beat and are a bunch of fish because they assume a girl doesn't know how to play and they think she just got lucky.

[/ QUOTE ]

For some reason losing poker players always think the winner, "just got lucky", it has nothing to do with her being female.

[/ QUOTE ]

the just got lucky belief is what supports us. don't knock it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.