#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
For $1,000 I'd think about it for a while, but probably still end up buying. For $350, I think it's a no-brainer if poker is a serious part of your life (i.e. you count on it as part of your income, as I think a good portion of MHNL posters do).
Kirk |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
My Winrate was 2.96ptbb/100 hands over 200,000 hands For some reason I got the idea that this game might be substantially more profitable than 30/60 limit. I guess not. [/ QUOTE ] What are the 30/60 winrates? I was at 3.6ptbb/100 after 180K hands if you want to use that number instead. edit: if i averaged in my winrate(not dollars won) and hand played at 50/100 NL, id be back up around 3.6ptbb/100. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
KKF any reason you aren't including your 5/10 6 max hands?
Would you consider including those? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
Stop bragging. Anyway, send me a free copy please. Cheers kid.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
KKF any reason you aren't including your 5/10 6 max hands? Would you consider including those? [/ QUOTE ] i deleted them all sadly. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My Winrate was 2.96ptbb/100 hands over 200,000 hands For some reason I got the idea that this game might be substantially more profitable than 30/60 limit. I guess not. [/ QUOTE ] What are the 30/60 winrates? I was at 3.6ptbb/100 after 180K hands if you want to use that number instead. edit: if i averaged in my winrate(not dollars won) and hand played at 50/100 NL, id be back up around 3.6ptbb/100. [/ QUOTE ] 2.5ish for a very good player. Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure about this? KKF is playing w/ probably an AP of 5-6. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My Winrate was 2.96ptbb/100 hands over 200,000 hands For some reason I got the idea that this game might be substantially more profitable than 30/60 limit. I guess not. [/ QUOTE ] What are the 30/60 winrates? I was at 3.6ptbb/100 after 180K hands if you want to use that number instead. edit: if i averaged in my winrate(not dollars won) and hand played at 50/100 NL, id be back up around 3.6ptbb/100. [/ QUOTE ] 2.5ish for a very good player. Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess. [/ QUOTE ] So how many hands are you guys seeing in an hour? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
By the way, I'm not screwing with Kane or anything here. I am actually considering this purchase. What would be the best way to view this database? Would I have to load it into a reader or just review each hand in its raw form?
Indy |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure about this? KKF is playing w/ probably an AP of 5-6. [/ QUOTE ] I gotta go in a minute so I don't have to look it up exactly, but ballpark 75ish full 120ish short. In my head was comparing short to short and full to full, but b/c of limited tables, short games aren't available at peak hours, so it's probably significantly less than 20-30% overall. Edit: My AP is around 7.8 |
|
|