|
|
#1
11-02-2005, 04:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Miller\'s small stack strategy= small bankroll?
You know Ed Miller's strategy for buying in for the minimum and just pushing with superior hands? Does this mean that when I try to determine a bankroll (i.e. 25xBuy in for that NL buy in) I can do it by 25xA min buy in? Just wondering if I'm playing NL with this strategy exclusively if I adjust the bankroll requirements as well.
|
|
#2
11-02-2005, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller\'s small stack strategy= small bankroll?
Are you trying to determine if you can play in a bigger game because of the reduced buy-in amount?
|
|
#3
11-02-2005, 04:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller\'s small stack strategy= small bankroll?
Yes. For example, in a $100 max NL game if my normal bankroll would be $2,500, would the bankroll now be $500 if I played the small stack strategy exclusively and bought into the $100 max game for $20 each time.
|
|
#4
11-02-2005, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller\'s small stack strategy= small bankroll?
It is probably +EV to play a full buy-in at a lower level than a min buy-in at a higher level. The loss in winrate does not compensate for the larger pots.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
