#1
|
|||
|
|||
Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
I play at sit&gos at 6 diferant sites. At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times. 3 of the sites 1 out of 3 and then there is Poker Stars where I have never made it to the money.
My statagy is to play tight until 6 players are left then lossen as plyaer are knocked out. Do diferant stagaties work better at some sites than others? or am I thinking to much Phix |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
I play at sit&gos at 6 diferant sites. At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times. [/ QUOTE ] Play at those two sites. Clearly they're monstrously profitable for you, so there's no real reason to play anywhere else. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times [/ QUOTE ] play at these two sites [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] seriously? depends. deep stack (PS) vs. short stack (PP) -- there is certainly a little more freedom in the deep stack game for exploiting an assumed post-flop superiority. without the post-flop skills, the deeper stack can actually be detrimental (assuming you participate post-flop too frequently regardless). 6 seated, 9 seated, 10 seated, start chips, blinds structures, etc. do have subtle (sometimes not so) differences. but employing the proper "tight early", "pushbot" late strategy will be relatively effective in most settings. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
He beat me to it.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times [/ QUOTE ] play at these two sites [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] seriously? depends. deep stack (PS) vs. short stack (PP) -- there is certainly a little more freedom in the deep stack game for exploiting an assumed post-flop superiority. without the post-flop skills, the deeper stack can actually be detrimental (assuming you participate post-flop too frequently regardless). 6 seated, 9 seated, 10 seated, start chips, blinds structures, etc. do have subtle (sometimes not so) differences. but employing the proper "tight early", "pushbot" late strategy will be relatively effective in most settings. [/ QUOTE ] You're too nice...you probably would humor Stanzee too. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously. [/ QUOTE ] Unless they're serious enough to know you're serious enough to know just how serious serious is. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously. [/ QUOTE ] Unless they're serious enough to know you're serious enough to know just how serious serious is. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] seriously |
|
|