|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
He beat me to it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously. [/ QUOTE ] Unless they're serious enough to know you're serious enough to know just how serious serious is. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or am I thinking to much [/ QUOTE ] With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small. First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning. [/ QUOTE ] ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously. [/ QUOTE ] Unless they're serious enough to know you're serious enough to know just how serious serious is. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] seriously |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
[ QUOTE ]
seriously [/ QUOTE ] Actually I'm just joking. |
|
|