|
|
|
|
#1
11-01-2005, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
[ QUOTE ]
At a $22 I call this pretty quickly. I mean, seriously, he's limped from MP with this hand and now likes it so much he's decided to push with it, despite the early position limper? This is almost never AA/KK and very rarely is it AK either. You're more likely to see some crap pair like 77/88 (they love these) or AJ, sooted or not. [/ QUOTE ] This is pretty much dead on I can't get my chips in fast enough 
|
|
#4
11-02-2005, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He showed AA... & I thought to myself "what a fish"... [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] because he limped in mp with AA after an early limper. would YOU do that?
|
|
#5
11-02-2005, 02:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He showed AA... & I thought to myself "what a fish"... [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] because he limped in mp with AA after an early limper. would YOU do that? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, depending on the table.
|
|
#6
11-02-2005, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
Double hand low (I think it's called that?) is something that generally only works if you're directly to act, or maybe a seat away from the original limper. It's pretty donkish in mid position if you ask me. Also you will very, very rarely see it happen, so don't feel bad. Next time flop a Q [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#7
11-02-2005, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He showed AA... & I thought to myself "what a fish"... [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] because he limped in mp with AA after an early limper. would YOU do that? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, depending on the table. [/ QUOTE ] level 1 of a 22 there is no reason to do this in mp after a limper, and yes this is an instant call
|
|
#8
11-02-2005, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He showed AA... & I thought to myself "what a fish"... [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] because he limped in mp with AA after an early limper. would YOU do that? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, depending on the table. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. If I felt reasonably confident somebody was going to PVS, a limp is an excellent play. See... oh, just as an example... this thread.
|
|
#9
11-02-2005, 03:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ against a limp-reraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He showed AA... & I thought to myself "what a fish"... [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] because he limped in mp with AA after an early limper. would YOU do that? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, depending on the table. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. If I felt reasonably confident somebody was going to PVS, a limp is an excellent play. See... oh, just as an example... this thread. [/ QUOTE ] where was the pvs at in this hand b/c I must have missed it. There are situations to limp aces sure but this isnt it
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
