|
|
#11
10-31-2005, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Win Rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I've only had PT for a few weeks, but I'm winning about the same as before I had it. My rate is 3.97/100 hands for around 5K hands. I know that is not enough hands but like I said I'm winning the same as before PT. I play $5/$10. [/ QUOTE ] I was at 7.4bb/100 at 2-4 over 5k hands. [/ QUOTE ] Holy crap you should right a book. [/ QUOTE ] I could explain thoroughly how to extract the most from set over set situations. |
|
#12
10-31-2005, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
[ QUOTE ]
2.718281828459045 BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] That's total crap. The best possible winrate is definitely: lim (1 + 1/n)^n as n approaches infinity. What is this, amateur hour? |
|
#13
10-31-2005, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
[ QUOTE ]
The day you look back and realize how insignificant this is, you'll have a good laugh. [/ QUOTE ] I know and I knew I would hear this, but I'm winning the same amount on avg as I was before PT. I look forward to seeing where I'm at at 10K, 25K, and 100K hands! All I know now is that I plan on doing the same thing and not changing my play at all. |
|
#14
10-31-2005, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The day you look back and realize how insignificant this is, you'll have a good laugh. [/ QUOTE ] I know and I knew I would hear this, but I'm winning the same amount on avg as I was before PT. I look forward to seeing where I'm at at 10K, 25K, and 100K hands! All I know now is that I plan on doing the same thing and not changing my play at all. [/ QUOTE ] Sounds like a good, progressive, learning strategy. |
|
#15
10-31-2005, 04:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2.718281828459045 BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] That's total crap. The best possible winrate is definitely: lim (1 + 1/n)^n as n approaches infinity. What is this, amateur hour? [/ QUOTE ] nice. I was about to ask Jason if he really knew e to 16 digits off the top of his head? |
|
#16
10-31-2005, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
[quote}
Sounds like a good, progressive, learning strategy. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not trying to be a jerk but I've been playing at the same site for 2+ years, my game gets better all the time. ( I bought in for $100 and have never put another dime in but takeout profit all the time) I spend a few hours every week reading new poker books and my game has improved. But right now I can't think of any good reason to change what I'm doing, I still read each week and look in here most days. But why would I "change" what is working so well. Let me ask you this, if I'm still at 4BB/100 after 10K, 25K or 100K hands would it be ok not to change then? That being said, if things change and the profit falls I would twik my game at that point. |
|
#17
10-31-2005, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2.718281828459045 BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] That's total crap. The best possible winrate is definitely: lim (1 + 1/n)^n as n approaches infinity. What is this, amateur hour? [/ QUOTE ] The real trick would be to calculate how many hands you'd need to get your winrate to this many decimal places. My guess is you'd have to play longer than a Hubble time. |
|
#18
10-31-2005, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
I'm at 1.3BB/100 for 2/4 over 47k hands and I suck, so more is sustainable.
|
|
#19
11-01-2005, 12:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
I am very humbled. I bow down to you, oh great poker god. By all means, never change how you play. You are obviously a protoge and have completely mastered the game in a very short time. I'm sure you will still be at 4BB/100 after 100k hands.
|
|
#20
11-01-2005, 12:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win Rates
I'm at 3.28/100 over 16.5k, but had a very very very hot streak and have just been back to normal for a few week. I would hope to level off between 2 and 2.5 in the long run. I'm not even close to good enough to stay in the 3+ range
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
