Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:25 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: 3/6 Stars KK river fold.

[ QUOTE ]
Because I often check flops where it is possible that a five-card hand is already out. This seems like a good spot to do that. Also, pot control.

[/ QUOTE ]

A five-card hand being a flopped a flush only?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2005, 03:12 PM
Spladle Master Spladle Master is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 374
Default Re: 3/6 Stars KK river fold.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because I often check flops where it is possible that a five-card hand is already out. This seems like a good spot to do that. Also, pot control.

[/ QUOTE ]

A five-card hand being a flopped a flush only?

[/ QUOTE ]
Straight, flush, full house, duh.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:07 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: 3/6 Stars KK river fold.

[ QUOTE ]
Straight, flush, full house, duh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but I am referring to this flop only. Not any possible 5 card hand. So you're checking behind here because you want pot control and a flush is likely? Please help me understand.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2005, 08:41 PM
Spladle Master Spladle Master is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 374
Default Re: 3/6 Stars KK river fold.

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, but I am referring to this flop only. Not any possible 5 card hand. So you're checking behind here because you want pot control and a flush is likely? Please help me understand.

[/ QUOTE ]
I threw in the "pot control" comment sarcastically because I am a snarky [censored]. People who advocate this concept often annoy me. I am sorry if this confused you. Sarcasm is difficult to convey on a message board.

And obviously a flush is not likely. Since there has been no betting yet, the only information we have to go on is card combinations. There is no reason to suspect that we are against a flush.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2005, 08:18 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: 3/6 Stars KK river fold.

[ QUOTE ]
There is no reason to suspect that we are against a flush.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right. So if we're not afraid of a flush, pot control isn't a factor, and there aren't any other 5 card hand possibilities.. why are we checking behind?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2005, 02:40 PM
Spladle Master Spladle Master is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 374
Default Re: 3/6 Stars KK river fold.

[ QUOTE ]
Right. So if we're not afraid of a flush, pot control isn't a factor, and there aren't any other 5 card hand possibilities.. why are we checking behind?

[/ QUOTE ]
Just a little mild deception in a situation where we have a pretty strong hand, but not a hand so strong that it welcomes a check-raise. I'm also not that worried about giving a free card, but getting a free card could be very valuable.

Some more factors but suffice it to say that I definitely check this flop more than half the time. Probably as high as 80% against some opponents.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.