#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wednesday and Still No Indictments????
Nut, you're nuts. But that's okay. You're in good company.
Anyway, here's the latest speculation from Hardball: http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/26/allen-fitzgerald/ They think their is a good chance that Fitzgerald got some sealed indictments today and that by Friday all will be known. As for me, all that I know is that G. Gordon Liddy is a very uncommon criminal, but a criminal nonetheless. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wednesday and Still No Indictments????
Did you decide to middle your bet as I suggested in this thread?
************************************************** ******** I already have bet $1000 and that is my limit. I made that bet because I'm 100% certain that Ronnie Earle is a partisan scumbag who has made a career of abusing his office and I'm 100% certain DeLay will get off. The brave person on this forum that took the bet is a non-Texan who is going to lose a $1000 because they think Ronnie Earle is legit. LOL! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] If I were to bet on this, I would require more info about Fitz and the case. As for the case there is just a lot of rumors. As for Fitz, I know nothing about him except he has spending tax payer money for the last two years and praised the Martha Steward charges which is worrisome to me.... I have a deep suspcian of all DAs. Very few of them don't abuse the power that is given to them. Some like Ronnie Reale go off the deep end. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wednesday and Still No Indictments????
Felix, if you follow my betting advice, you'll be middling your bet, you will not be able to lose. Don't just ignore me because I'm liberal!
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wednesday and Still No Indictments????
six munce uhgo I cuh-nunt eevun spell in-jun-ear, now I r won
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Link to future Rove/Libby Indictment Website at DOJ
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/index.html This appears to be the URL where any indictments of Robe, Libby, or whomever else will appear next week. Washington Post Article <font color="green"> Fitzgerald Launches Web Site By Dan Froomkin Special to washingtonpost.com Friday, October 21, 2005; 1:00 PM Special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has just launched his own brand-new Web site. Could it be that he's getting ready to release some new legal documents? Like, maybe, some indictments? It's certainly not the action of an office about to fold up its tents and go home. </font> [/ QUOTE ] I ponder who will be replacing the Vice President if he is involed in this matter. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wednesday and Still No Indictments????
Felix I just reread your message, my bet was a middle for you on the delay bet. Nothing to do with Fitz. Read my post. It will gaurantee you cannot lose.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Link to future Rove/Libby Indictment Website at DOJ
The latest news today is that he reportedly signed a lease to expand his office space, too.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wednesday and Still No Indictments????
[ QUOTE ]
Some like Ronnie Reale go off the deep end. [/ QUOTE ] There is something sublime about reading FELIX saying that someone else is "off the deep end". [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Thursday: No Indictments
It would be hard to believe that Fitz would be spending the tax payer's money for almost two years and not have anything to show for it. Is he begging Libby/Rove to plead to a misdemeanor? or has the press been BSing us the last few weeks with meritless rumors? My instincts tell me that Fitz does not have much and feels pressured to justify his investigation with some indictments......but he is reluctant to indict Libby/Rove on an innocent contradictions that could be attributed to a faulty memory on conversations that are over two years old. Geez. Don't ask me about conversations that are two WEEKS old much less two YEARS. It is not like saying, 'Gee whiz, I forgot that Monica gave me a BJ in the Oval office while I penetrated her with a cigar'.
The NYT has been distancing themselves from Judy Miller and implying that she is a liar. If Miller is Fitz's 'star witness', then Fitz does not have much of a case. Friday will be VERY interesting.... |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: No Indictments
The grand jury doesn't meet today. They meet tomorrow. We'll see. Maybe you are right. (Everbody hear that, I'm admitting Felix might be right!)
Maybe their won't be any indictments. Felix, have you decided to middle your DeLay bet? You can't lose! |
|
|