Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-26-2005, 05:58 PM
Garbonzo Garbonzo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 8
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

For those advocating raising KJs UTG, I would be curious what kind of profit you are making? Do any of you have extensive databases AND usually raise KJs so that we could look at actual numbers?

I seldom raise, and only limp it under certain gamee conditions so my numbers are relatively useless.

In my opinoin this decision depends heavily on YOUR table image at the time, for example, is a LP agressor more likely to fold or raise a hand like Kqo or AJo.

If anyone has any data to back up this discussion I think that would be just super! I am very interested....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:03 PM
JinX11 JinX11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Will poker for money.
Posts: 431
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

Interested, as well. I'll check this out in my database when I get home....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:07 PM
Borodog Borodog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

Limping big suited hands OOP always makes them easier to play. But that doesn't mean it's proper to do so.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:17 PM
Garbonzo Garbonzo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 8
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

Can you explain your thoughts on this please? My instinct is to disagree...

I think *generally* it is almost easier to be the agressor, you get played back at much much less by hands you beat, in some way declare where you are at and let people react with a more honest declaration of where they stand.

Certainly many hands played agressively lead to bad folds by your opponents, where as this seems to occur much less with limping hands....

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:55 PM
SenecaJim SenecaJim is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

Yes. I play it. Calling or raising here is so close really ok either way you play it, IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:03 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

I limped UTG with KJs while playing in a very juicy, loose passive 5/10 Kill game at Foxwoods last week.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-26-2005, 08:29 PM
JinX11 JinX11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Will poker for money.
Posts: 431
Default Re: Maybe Stupid PF Question KJs

[ QUOTE ]
Interested, as well. I'll check this out in my database when I get home....

[/ QUOTE ]

My stats (Sample Size Man would not be pleased):

Total Sample: 92K hands with > 9 players

KJs:

All Positions - 284 hands
PFR %: 36.98%
BB/100: 0.315

Late Position - 75 hands
PFR %: 48.00%
BB/100: 0.1589

Middle Position - 94 hands
PFR %: 57.45%
BB/100: 0.2787

Early Position - 58 hands
PFR %: 13.79%
BB/100: 0.9097

UTG - 37 hands
PFR %: 10.81%
BB/100: 0.6035


Probably not much you can draw from this except that my sample of KJs hands is WAY too small to draw much at all. For me, I do seem to play the hand better in early position than I do overall; part of that for me may be because I tend to play the hand multiway by limping.

But, given the feedback by some pretty good posters, sounds like it's time to experiment a little with this in my game. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.