|
|
#61
10-20-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
[ QUOTE ]
He probably had 72o. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Good luck pwning today! Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] I agree. He's probably spurring us all to respond as part of some grand move that will pay off three years from now. I'm serious. Any third-party or T.V. evidence that he had JT? 
|
|
#62
10-20-2005, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He probably had 72o. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Good luck pwning today! Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] I agree. He's probably spurring us all to respond as part of some grand move that will pay off three years from now. I'm serious. Any third-party or T.V. evidence that he had JT? [/ QUOTE ] You guys are failing to see that the 72 hand is a completely different hand. Go read the MTT forum.
|
|
#63
10-20-2005, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
Congrats Gigabet on your 20th place finish!
|
|
#64
10-20-2005, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He probably had 72o. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Good luck pwning today! Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] I agree. He's probably spurring us all to respond as part of some grand move that will pay off three years from now. I'm serious. Any third-party or T.V. evidence that he had JT? [/ QUOTE ] You guys are failing to see that the 72 hand is a completely different hand. Go read the MTT forum. [/ QUOTE ] No I'm not. I hate you. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Yugoslav
|
|
#65
10-20-2005, 06:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The 4 cannot have helped Dan, so the only hands that beat Gigabet are: 33 - 3 ways TT - 1 way JJ - 1 way There are 18 ways Dan can have QQ++ and 12 ways for a weaker 2 pr. 30 hands that Dan could be playing like this. [/ QUOTE ] I think JJ or TT are extremely unlikely. Harrington almost certainly would have raised preflop with these and there are only so many jacks and tens in the deck. Really 33 is all you are worried about, unless Harrington had 44 and was bluffing on the flop, but got lucky on the turn. Harrington could have J3, T3, 98, or maybe QQ-AA. He could also be bluffing. Remember the reraise with 62o against Raymer and Arieh at the WSOP. [/ QUOTE ] I'm surprised no one has suggested Qh9h.
|
|
#66
10-20-2005, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He probably had 72o. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Good luck pwning today! Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] I agree. He's probably spurring us all to respond as part of some grand move that will pay off three years from now. I'm serious. Any third-party or T.V. evidence that he had JT? [/ QUOTE ] You guys are failing to see that the 72 hand is a completely different hand. Go read the MTT forum. [/ QUOTE ] Me neither. I caught the reference. But I don't hate you.
|
|
#69
10-20-2005, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
This is a terrible fold. Period.
You people need to realize that folding top two in this situation IS TERRIBLE NO MATTER THE PLAYERS. Even the Rockest of players will double-raise here with a lesser two pair.
|
|
#70
10-20-2005, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Festa al Lago....Gigabet is weak tight at heart.
Both this and the 72o hand (which I don't think is anywhere near what you really had) are completely retarded, so congratulations. Why is it you never post hands where the action is, you know, the right one? Instead it's obscure and intensely questionable plays designed to make it look like your game is so far beyond the rest of ours that we can't possibly fathom it. Have you ever done something normal, like open with AA, or fold 83o?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
