Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-19-2005, 11:24 PM
Webster Webster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 835
Default Re: Packers/Vikings

Well - if you want to talk history!! LOL - I think Bart Starr had some problems if you want to factor that in also!! LOL
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-19-2005, 11:28 PM
IHateKeithSmart IHateKeithSmart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: check folding the nuts
Posts: 182
Default Re: Invoking the obvious

[ QUOTE ]
Invoking the obvious Tice rule here. Stay away from both sides.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jedi - don't you have a rule that precludes you from betting any games? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

FWIW, word is that Green will be in on Sunday (that's what the locals are saying). I don't think it's a sure thing by any stretch, but I'm taking the packers.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-20-2005, 01:51 PM
benfranklin benfranklin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 155
Default Re: Packers/Vikings

[ QUOTE ]
Any reason NOT to bet on the Packers? -2 (-101) at pinnacle right now

[/ QUOTE ]

St. Paul Pioneer Press:

[ QUOTE ]
It isn't only Vikings fans who want to know whether player suspensions will decimate the team's lineup for Sunday's game against Green Bay. Las Vegas is watching closely, too.

That's why Sunday's noon game at the Metrodome is officially off the board for bettors at Nevada sports books.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.