#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
[ QUOTE ]
very sustainable... [/ QUOTE ] Was this a joke or were you serious? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
50% isn't sustainable at the turbos, but at the regulars it is.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
I'm keeping a steady 35% ROI at these (5-tabling), and I suck. (small sample size though, maybe i'm just on a big run of cards. Doesn't seem like it, though..)
I see no reason why a solid, experienced player couldn't get 50%+. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
I think you are clearly incorrect here. First of all, you are getting 20% more investment with no additional rake by moving from the $5.50s to the $6.50s, and second I think that most players do not grasp the importance of the gap concept at this level, which is much more evident in turbos as compared to regular SNGs. Also I can get 6-turbos in in less than an hour, where as 6 regulars would take closer to 75 minutes.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
You think the play is bad? Here's a nice example:
PokerStars Game #2812082470: Tournament #13836643, Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2005/10/15 - 19:01:25 (ET) Table '13836643 1' Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: Tre'bien (1440 in chips) Seat 2: boww23 (1720 in chips) Seat 3: joeyzaza9 (1360 in chips) Seat 4: Janaco (1480 in chips) Seat 5: SHIRLEY (1460 in chips) Seat 6: cbjt (1580 in chips) Seat 7: IMSAKIDD (1500 in chips) Seat 8: lorita38 (1480 in chips) Seat 9: Oger511 (1480 in chips) Janaco: posts small blind 10 SHIRLEY: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to IMSAKIDD [Kh Ks] cbjt: folds IMSAKIDD: raises 60 to 80 lorita38: calls 80 Oger511: folds Tre'bien: folds boww23: folds joeyzaza9: folds Janaco: folds SHIRLEY: folds *** FLOP *** [Tc Kd 7c] IMSAKIDD: checks lorita38: checks *** TURN *** [Tc Kd 7c] [Td] IMSAKIDD: bets 120 lorita38: calls 120 *** RIVER *** [Tc Kd 7c Td] [Jh] IMSAKIDD: bets 350 lorita38: raises 350 to 700 IMSAKIDD: raises 600 to 1300 and is all-in lorita38: calls 580 and is all-in *** SHOW DOWN *** IMSAKIDD: shows [Kh Ks] (a full house, Kings full of Tens) lorita38: shows [9c As] (a pair of Tens) IMSAKIDD collected 2990 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 2990 | Rake 0 Board [Tc Kd 7c Td Jh] Seat 1: Tre'bien folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: boww23 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: joeyzaza9 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: Janaco (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 5: SHIRLEY (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 6: cbjt folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: IMSAKIDD showed [Kh Ks] and won (2990) with a full house, Kings full of Tens Seat 8: lorita38 showed [9c As] and lost with a pair of Tens Seat 9: Oger511 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Obviously a pro read. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
[ QUOTE ]
50% isn't sustainable at the turbos, but at the regulars it is. [/ QUOTE ] Please elaborate on this theory. I am genuinely interested. Onaflag.......... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600 $6.50 Turbo SNGs, 6 at a time
Regulars give you more time to outplay the fish.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
10% Complete Update
Still doing above average, however not as hot as I was during the first 5 sessions, due mostly to one session of 6 SNGs where I did not cash in any. Here are my results:
Session 6 - 6 Other Session 7 - 1 1st, 2 2nd, 1 3rd, 2 Other Session 8 - 1 1st, 2 2nd, 3 Other Session 9 - 2 1st, 1 3rd, 2 Other Session 10 - 1 1st, 1 2nd, 1 3rd, 3 Other Totals through 10 Sessions (60 SNGs): 14 - 1sts 9 - 2nds 9 - 3rds 28 - Other ITM - 53.3% Total Profit - $231 ROI - 59.2% |
|
|