|
View Poll Results: If you are winning, do you play the last set of the night and risk going to bed on a negative note? | |||
Yes | 32 | 61.54% | |
No | 20 | 38.46% | |
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Again, 90k hands on 50%/40% 2.46bb winning player
In the books/pubs forum Greenstein mentioned something about Ivey actually occasionally playing low-limits online and playing EVERY hand and trying to win as much as he could.
Just an exercise he enjoyed or something like that. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Again, 90k hands on 50%/40% 2.46bb winning player
That I can see, but 92k hands? I wonder what that guy's graph looks like.
WiteKnite |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Again, 90k hands on 50%/40% 2.46bb winning player
[ QUOTE ]
How many 50/30 players did you profile for that long [/ QUOTE ] 50/40, not 30 There was only 1 50/40 player. Any others turned out to be the same player. Any other player that was over 30% prf was very rare and those that were, were much looser, like 64%-75% vpip so in effect a totally different kind of player and loosers. I proved my point time and time again that LAGs can win and be as good a winners as any TAG, there are not many TAGs who beat 2.4bb/100 with zero table selection playing $10/$20 up always 4 tabling, over 90k hands, after that I stopped watching. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Again, 90k hands on 50%/40% 2.46bb winning player
[ QUOTE ]
possible for an EXCELLENT post-flop player [/ QUOTE ] Someone in this forum quoted the player as playing some of the best post flop plays he had ever seen. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Again, 90k hands on 50%/40% 2.46bb winning player
[ QUOTE ]
think he is one of the people that Feeney talks about in "Inside the Poker Mind." He is looking for the "secret" to how these people play so many hands and yet win so much. [/ QUOTE ] I was pretty much a begining player and was doing as advised, watching winning players, and then posting my observations which did not conform to 2+2 playing. This player was one of the biggest winners, played the most. This forum dismissed my findings after 10k hands and told me to come back at 100k hands which I pretty much did, including $10/$20 I would have 100k hands on him, |
|
|