#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL AT, flop mid pair
If he's against a set, is he not a 2.35:1 dog?
If he calls to 20 that's 15.5 to win 27, right? If he pushes that's 37.5 to win 49, right? I don't think he has the odds vs a set. It would be tough for me to put him on less than a set given the pfr and if he does have less than a set then he is a poor player imo and you can get his money later. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL AT, flop mid pair
[ QUOTE ]
That assumes he knew he had 2 pair instead of a set. I would instantly put villain on a set. [/ QUOTE ] are you kidding me? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL AT, flop mid pair
[ QUOTE ]
If he's against a set, is he not a 2.35:1 dog? [/ QUOTE ] TT seems unlikely since we have one of the T's, and QQ is unlikley cause villain limp/called. [ QUOTE ] pokenum -h ac tc - 7h 7s -- td 7c qc Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing Qc 7c Td cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Ac Tc 307 31.01 683 68.99 0 0.00 0.310 7s 7h 683 68.99 307 31.01 0 0.00 0.690 [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If he calls to 20 that's 15.5 to win 27, right? If he pushes that's 37.5 to win 49, right? I don't think he has the odds vs a set. It would be tough for me to put him on less than a set given the pfr and if he does have less than a set then he is a poor player imo and you can get his money later. [/ QUOTE ] You're right, we don't have odds vs. a set. We are assuming that (chances he has a set)*(0.3) + (chances he has 2pr)*(0.55) + (chances he has other garbage)*(big favorite) = +EV It's just not THAT likely that he has a set. |
|
|