#21
|
|||
|
|||
Results
I folded. The river bettor had aces no club. The fish had 56 no club for a flopped straight. $2600 that could have been mine.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
awesome read by me
how does aces no club not 3-bet the flop? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 9Ts
[ QUOTE ]
i would call river and likely play the entire hand the same way you did. you could have raise on the flop or turn, but then you would have had to make a post like "was this chip spewing cause the guy 3 bet me" [/ QUOTE ] qouting one's own post seems to be the thing these days. i saw daryn do it. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 9Ts
[ QUOTE ]
Woa how can you not CR the flop?? [/ QUOTE ] |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 9Ts
[ QUOTE ]
how can the button not have a club? [/ QUOTE ] Play enough poker and you'll see everything. I wouldn't argue the fold was wrong, but I would argue that the refusal/inability the see that his hand may possibly be good is a major flaw. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
[ QUOTE ]
awesome read by me how does aces no club not 3-bet the flop? [/ QUOTE ] And why bet that river? It's a really bad river bet into 2. Krishan |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
[ QUOTE ]
I folded. The river bettor had aces no club. The fish had 56 no club for a flopped straight. $2600 that could have been mine. [/ QUOTE ] If you had CR the flop, you're seeing the river, right? AND you win more than $2600. (maybe) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 9Ts
Missed folds on all streets.
Preflop, I'm not raising with this UTG. I just don't think 109s is good enough to play five-handed. On the flop, a fold should be considered because it's unlikely one pair will be the best hand and your draw really isn't that good. On the turn, the pot may be bigger, but your hand has gone down in value. The only chance is an offsuit jack or six and that might not be good enough. On the river, you can't call with a non-nut straight and a four-flush on board. Just give this one up. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 9Ts
[ QUOTE ]
Preflop, I'm not raising with this UTG. I just don't think 109s is good enough to play five-handed. [/ QUOTE ] I agree but I'm assuming it's not your default play and that your image and table conditions were such that you thought you could turn a profit here and now. Krishan |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 9Ts
I think T9s is plenty of hand with to open in the hijack
|
|
|