Are the New PP 50-100 games any better than before....

[bicyclekick]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'll probably go play 20/40 and 30/60 and keep my eye out for good bigger games.

[/ QUOTE ]

??

[/ QUOTE ]

"and keep my eye out for good bigger games"

That 300/600 game was a gem. Most of these 50/100 and 100/200 games are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Today you had the best seat in the house, to the left of LoisLane and Steve95 and you only sat for a few min? Whats the deal? I kept getting booted off the list. Puke.

[/ QUOTE ]


I played maybe 50 hands, won a couple thousand and decided I didn't feel like it. They weren't playing like super donks and I didn't feel like 300/600 variance was worth it. I tend to want one marrakes quality player to play in that game with those guys. Steve and lois aren't great but they lead to big variance and emotionally I didn't want to deal with it. Throw marrakes or some other tard in there and I'm in.

[PokerMike]

I kinda understand what you're saying about the swings, but i still feel that sitting directly left to Lois and Steve you have a substantial edge. You're definately right about marrakes though, hes the top of my most money won list.

[4thstreetpete]

Playing in a few 100/200 tables today and the games don't look too bad. I do notice it's a lot different than the 30/60 though. I don't have enough experience on the 100/200 to know for certain.
What I do notice is it's way more aggressive with people trying really hard to push you off your hand. I see a lot of capping and turn raises on a scary board from people with just top pair trying to represent a flush or a straight. Good notes are important.
Regular players correct me if I'm wrong here. Thanks.

[bicyclekick]

[ QUOTE ]
but i still feel that sitting directly left to Lois and Steve you have a substantial edge.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you over estimate my abilities. Thanks though.