|
|
#11
10-07-2005, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK vs. all-in + likely isolation
[ QUOTE ]
Actually, I think I was wrong. Posted too fast, then wasn't fast enough on the delete key. Sorry about that. I'm now thinking this is a fold, but I'll let others puzzle it out. [/ QUOTE ] Uh-huh! So I was right to begin with! LOL! 
|
|
#12
10-07-2005, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK vs. all-in + likely isolation *DELETED*
Maybe fold is right. Maybe I give too little credit to reshove guy.
|
|
#13
10-07-2005, 10:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK vs. all-in + likely isolation
I hate AK. I raise like most people say I should, miss the flop and then what ????? I understand the value of raising having knocked someone out of a tournament recently with my 75s in an unraised pot (flop K75 and he went AI - sweet, sweet sweet). But mostly I just want to do what the ING guy says - save my money! But I know it's wrong. The confusion continues . . .
|
|
#14
10-08-2005, 04:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK vs. all-in + likely isolation
[ QUOTE ]
I hate AK. I raise like most people say I should, miss the flop and then what ????? The confusion continues . . . [/ QUOTE ] AK is a moneymaker for me. Most people overvalue it. Lose enough to the Mighty Ducks--22--and it will drive the point home. AK is a drawing hand. Most opponents play it like it was a made hand, like they've got a weak AA or something. It's not. I know this. They don't. That's why it's a moneymaker for me. Housenuts, nice hand post, btw. This is another in a series of nice hand posts I've seen here lately. I honestly don't know and that's the truth. Put me in this exact spot 10 times and I play it both ways 5 each, I think. It really is a case I'd have to be sitting there at the time. It's that close, to me. My first thought was call the all in. My second thought was there are still a lot of players and as this is PS (right?), there's still a lot of time left. I'd hate to let this one go, but I probably would. Close call. CJ
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
