|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reason why Party 3/6 is tighter than 5/10 short?
Blind structure. 3-6 SHOULD play tighter than 5-10, and 5-10 SHOULD play tighter than 10-20, and 10 SHOULD play tighter than 15-30.
I dont know if that is the case, but that is the theory. -blake |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reason why Party 3/6 is tighter than 5/10 short?
[ QUOTE ]
Blind structure. 3-6 SHOULD play tighter than 5-10, and 5-10 SHOULD play tighter than 10-20, and 10 SHOULD play tighter than 15-30. I dont know if that is the case, but that is the theory. -blake [/ QUOTE ] Not so sure about that. Only the good players know how to play the blinds correctly; and as you move down, you will see less good players. According to your theory, 1/2 and 10/20 should play with the same tightness. We know that's not the case. I think OP has just come across some bad 3/6 games and is basing his opinion on that over the short haul. It would be interesting, however, to see Party change the 3/6 and 5/10 blind structures to $2/$3 and $3/$5 respectively. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reason why Party 3/6 is tighter than 5/10 short?
[ QUOTE ]
It would be interesting, however, to see Party change the 3/6 and 5/10 blind structures to $2/$3 and $3/$5 respectively. [/ QUOTE ] Now wouldn´t that be swell... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reason why Party 3/6 is tighter than 5/10 short?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Blind structure. 3-6 SHOULD play tighter than 5-10, and 5-10 SHOULD play tighter than 10-20, and 10 SHOULD play tighter than 15-30. I dont know if that is the case, but that is the theory. -blake [/ QUOTE ] Not so sure about that. Only the good players know how to play the blinds correctly; and as you move down, you will see less good players. According to your theory, 1/2 and 10/20 should play with the same tightness. We know that's not the case. I think OP has just come across some bad 3/6 games and is basing his opinion on that over the short haul. It would be interesting, however, to see Party change the 3/6 and 5/10 blind structures to $2/$3 and $3/$5 respectively. [/ QUOTE ] I agree that it doesn't work out this way (which is good). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reason why Party 3/6 is tighter than 5/10 short?
[ QUOTE ]
It would be interesting, however, to see Party change the 3/6 and 5/10 blind structures to $2/$3 and $3/$5 respectively. [/ QUOTE ] Or just 1.50/3 and 2.50/5. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reason why Party 3/6 is tighter than 5/10 short?
[ QUOTE ]
Or just 1.50/3 and 2.50/5. [/ QUOTE ] Good point Evan. They don't make the blinds $7/$10 in 10/20. Now, that I'm thinking about it, it makes no sense whatsoever. In B&M, making change slows the game down, but online, that's not a problem. Even weirder....The 15/30 Omaha H/L Party game has a blind structure of $7/$15. I wonder why. |
|
|