Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2005, 07:29 AM
stripsqueez stripsqueez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Adelaide , South Australia
Posts: 1,055
Default intriguing stats

i have a pet student who i met playing draw at paradise - she is a sensational draw player and wanted to get good at short handed holdem

after many lessons she was a small winner in the 5/10 6 max games at party (150,000 odd hands - she is an obsessive insomniac so she did these hands in like 4 months - and i figure that her win rate towards the end of those hands would be around 2 BB's/100 hands) and she insisted on moving up to 10/20 so more lessons...

she sent me her stats for the first 15,000 hands of 10/20 - VP$IP 26% - PFR 19% - flop and turn aggro factors of around 2 - solid numbers for defending her blinds - steal % of 35 - all pretty good in my view particularly as she started off playing short handed being too passive

but - W$WSF 44.5% - WSD 45% - W$@SD 47.5%

wow - it seems no-one bluffs this woman successfully

after 15,000 hands i figure the last 3 stats are reliable but maybe i'm wrong ? - she has good instincts and i'm guessing part of the explanation for these stats is the more common bluffing in 10/20 compared to 5/10 - needless to say i think she is calling down too much but to some extent this is a matter of style - i mean can anybody else with a VP$IP of 26 show me a W$WSF of 44.5% ??? - although she was a small loser for this set of hands i'm starting to consider to what extent these stats are bad ???

stripsqueez - chickenhawk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2005, 08:04 AM
MoDOH MoDOH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: intriguing stats

For my first 25 k hands of 10/20 my stats were:
VP$IP 25%
pfr 18%
folded SB 80%
folded BB 60%
Att. steal 35%
Won $ WSF 49,74%
Went SD 35%
Won $ ASD 54%
With aggr. numbers of
flop 2,35
turn 2,01
river 1,55
all these with 5.2 people on average...

Do you wan´t to hear the funny part? I was breakeven during those hands, mostly due to a horrendous start, but still...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2005, 09:11 AM
cartman cartman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: intriguing stats

One thing that is extraordinary is that her W$@SD is possibly an indication that she had a great run of cards and that maybe under normal circumstances her WTSD wouldn't be so high. These two are inextricably linked and I think the product of the two, which Jeff W called the CDSC should be in the same ballpark for everyone. For instance, MoDOH's stats above are fairly typical and his product is .35*.54=.189. Your student's is .45*.475 = .214. I think I recall several players (Peter specifically) having WTSD of around 40%, but I don't remember seeing anyone higher than that.

I really don't know what type, but I think this sample must be an aberration of some kind.

Cartman
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2005, 03:02 PM
TeeJayORTj TeeJayORTj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: I just like the hat above
Posts: 88
Default Re: intriguing stats

My first 20K hands at 10/20 I had a
W$WSF 44% - WSD 44% - W$@SD 48.5%
So very similar to her stats. The big difference on my end was a VPIP of 32 and an incredibally good winrate. Also I tend to go to the 4 or 5 handed tables.

Ironically my stats over my last 10K hands are very similar yet I'm a small loser.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.