#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
You have....
<font color="white"> KJ/KQ/AK </font> You say its a legit raise do i assume you dont hold J2/K2/22 2pair at most you have, no set IMO. River looks like you realise you only hold one pair so call. So yeah, i reckon you lost. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
Since you didn't raise the river I would say KJ.
Since you had 22 I would say raise the river. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think the table sees me as a little too LAG PF, and way too LAG post-flop (checkraise bluff caps and such). I have shown down my fair share of winners, but most of those have been played very passively. [/ QUOTE ] And then you go and open-raise 22? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] You aren't openraising this from the button? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
*grunch*
looks like AA, AK, or KJ maybe some draw/pair combination like A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
Nice trifecta JJ or KK [/ QUOTE ] no way. not 3betting this river with JJ/KK is unimaginable. |
|
|