#1
|
|||
|
|||
interesting little AA hand
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
stannnndard
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
I think you played this perfectly.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
Pot flop, check turn.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
[ QUOTE ]
Check turn. [/ QUOTE ] Why? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Check turn. [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] Because betting is dumb? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
looks good.
also pokerhand actually have a 2+2 convereter now so you dont need to link to it anymore. paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
Yes, I think checking might be the best. If you bet, you're not going to be comfortable with anything else except a fold. If villain calls, it sucks, and if villain raises, it sucks even more.
I check and if he checks behind, I bet the river. If he bets turn, I call, and what I would do on the river would depend on the player. I'm guessing you had a read on him since you both have pretty big stacks? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
hmm no reads? river I either blocking bet or check/call up to 2/3rds pot. You could be up against any Ace two pair unless you have a read that says otherwise (particularly AJ). I think river decision is marginal EV contingent on a read in either direction. I don 't mind folding this here, well played
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interesting little AA hand
I like betting pot on flop, and checkraising the turn. He's forced to bet in that spot no matter what he has IMO. So by checking you have a chance to induce a bluff and then when you raise he drops everything except the Q. If he checks behind then you lead out with a value bet on the river unless a spade falls... then i'd I c/c the river.
|
|
|