2+2 table? - Page 2

kapw7 · #11 09-23-2005, 09:33 PM

Come on little girls!

MrWookie47 · #12 09-23-2005, 10:00 PM

C'mon guys. One more warm body.

ClaytonN · #13 09-23-2005, 10:29 PM

monix:

please show. Thanks.

ChickenFud · #14 09-23-2005, 10:35 PM

So really pushing those quad 4's was the way to go, huh?

MrWookie47 · #15 09-23-2005, 10:38 PM

Yeah. You could have gotten at least another SB out of villain by fastplaying, or raising sooner, typically. He won't put you on quads.

ClaytonN · #16 09-23-2005, 10:54 PM

2+2 tables are known for going nuts with marginal holdings, trying to exploit small edges. Therefore it only makes sense to push your monsters hard.

MrWookie47 · #17 09-23-2005, 11:29 PM

Is slow777 a lurker? He's not very good, and he's not very polite.

Edit: But he is a lucksack.

kapw7 · #18 09-23-2005, 11:34 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Is slow777 a lurker? He's not very good, and he's not very polite.

Edit: But he is a lucksack.

[/ QUOTE ]

MrWookie47 · #19 09-23-2005, 11:44 PM

Alright. It's settled then. We take his money. Unless he keeps sucking out.

monix · #20 09-23-2005, 11:47 PM

Agreed!