now that we've had some time, whats a solid WR for the Party 30/60? - Page 4

InfernoLL · #31 09-20-2005, 01:16 AM

Then what's the settlement? I'm actually interested in a number or a reasonable range.

James282 · #32 09-20-2005, 01:23 AM

[ QUOTE ]
What a bunch of arrogant pricks now inhabit the mid-high forum.

you can all go blow me.

-Scott

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope you aren't referring to my post. I was being totally serious and not trying to be condescending. All I'm saying is that there are far more accurate ways to size up how you're doing than checking your bb/100 after 25k hands. Relax, Scott.
-James

ggbman · #33 09-20-2005, 01:25 AM

overreacting a bit here, some people just found "witty" ways of saying we still don't know, and 100k is a very arbitrary figure. The consensus is your a winner and are doing well, and no one really has a great idea what is doable, but the best can probably make 2-2.5 bb/100. How is that?

mike l. · #34 09-20-2005, 01:57 AM

"you can all go blow me."

well..okay... but only because youve already got it whipped out for all to see.

elmo · #35 09-20-2005, 02:33 AM

I don't do stats much, but isn't it 1.92? I hope not, because that is what I've been using, and I'd much prefer a lower number.

response to dpr*

DpR · #36 09-20-2005, 02:51 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I don't do stats much, but isn't it 1.92? I hope not, because that is what I've been using, and I'd much prefer a lower number.

response to dpr*

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you meant 1.96. Regardless, that is for 95% confindence for a two sided test (i.e. your win rate is greater than x but less than y). For a 1 sided test the 95% z-value is the same as for the 90% 2 sided test.

elmo · #37 09-20-2005, 02:56 AM

Sorry to keep showing my ignorance... and yes i meant 1.96. If you take a hypothetical winrate and STDEV like 2 - (1.67*15), aren't you going to get a silly-low number?

sublime · #38 09-20-2005, 03:24 AM

[ QUOTE ]
"you can all go blow me."

well..okay... but only because youve already got it whipped out for all to see.

[/ QUOTE ]

awesome. some of your best work ever, and in one sentance.

DpR · #39 09-20-2005, 03:29 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry to keep showing my ignorance... and yes i meant 1.96. If you take a hypothetical winrate and STDEV like 2 - (1.67*15), aren't you going to get a silly-low number?

[/ QUOTE ]

Divide the 15 by the square root of your total hands/100 (divide first)

gonores · #40 09-20-2005, 03:37 AM

I saw this post for days and didn't open it. Then I opened it today because I wanted to roll my eyes at something. I was pleasantly surprised to see that practically no one replied with an actual BB/100 number. I was going to make a reply to this thread in such a nature until I read your post. Then I decided to make this reply instead.