|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sanity Check - Back in the saddle
The blinds are very large compared to your stack. you would be putting half of it at risk with 94o against a short stack move which is virtually almost any "Face Card". So you would more than likely be behind. not to mention if you lose you would only have 2 rounds worth of blinds and would have to resort to playing the weaker hands yourself. At least you still had a cushion. The utg would still be on an uphill battle and would have to continue to play the weaker than usual cards.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sanity Check - Back in the saddle
[ QUOTE ]
The blinds are very large compared to your stack. you would be putting half of it at risk with 94o against a short stack move which is virtually almost any "Face Card". So you would more than likely be behind. not to mention if you lose you would only have 2 rounds worth of blinds and would have to resort to playing the weaker hands yourself. At least you still had a cushion. The utg would still be on an uphill battle and would have to continue to play the weaker than usual cards. [/ QUOTE ] The blinds are too big and your odds are too good to fold here. According to ICM... Folding = .3221 Call and win = .407 Call and lose = .2889 .3221 = (.407)(x) + (.2889)(1-x) x = .281 Do you think 94 is less than .281 against pushers range? Even if you lose you still have a lot of FE. I can't imagine folding here. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sanity Check - Back in the saddle
[ QUOTE ]
The blinds are very large compared to your stack. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] This is exactly why you call. |
|
|