|
View Poll Results: which book is just worthless | |||
Holdem for Advanced Players | 1 | 0.77% | |
Tournament Poker | 7 | 5.38% | |
Zen of Poker | 17 | 13.08% | |
Caros Book of Tells | 8 | 6.15% | |
Hellmuth / and his book | 85 | 65.38% | |
Harrington on Holdem | 3 | 2.31% | |
SuperSystem1/2 | 5 | 3.85% | |
Theory of Poker | 4 | 3.08% | |
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
I dont know about most people but i perfer So Cal casinos more better than vegas poker rooms. 9 seated w/ jackpots. Does anybody else agree with me?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
I prefer SoCal because the games are soft.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
Vegas. Lower rake. Plus, I like to play shorthanded which is more feasible in Vegas.
Also, all of the nice rooms in Vegas have no jackpot, which I think is a plus. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
I just got back from vegas, and although I had a losing experience, I have to say that I would prefer to play in vegas. Simply because the majority of people who play in vegas are there to gamble, they have a set amount of money and are willing to take chances with that money. In the long run these players will pay you off!!! Ca casinos are so full of rocks, lags, and old women that are doing poker to suplement their retirement checks. And while I found an old lady or 2 in vegas rooms while their husbands pissed off money at craps, they are more dominant in local ca casinos.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
[ QUOTE ]
Ca casinos are so full of rocks, lags, and old women that are doing poker to suplement their retirement checks. [/ QUOTE ] I have never met a woman over 60 at Los Angeles card club who wasn't a full on fishy calling station. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
i wasnt saying they werent fish, I agree with you
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
[ QUOTE ]
I just got back from vegas, and although I had a losing experience, I have to say that I would prefer to play in vegas. Simply because the majority of people who play in vegas are there to gamble, they have a set amount of money and are willing to take chances with that money. In the long run these players will pay you off!!! Ca casinos are so full of rocks, lags, and old women that are doing poker to suplement their retirement checks. And while I found an old lady or 2 in vegas rooms while their husbands pissed off money at craps, they are more dominant in local ca casinos. [/ QUOTE ] Did you confuse California with Connecticut? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
sorry never been to conneticut..... This is just what I have expereince over the last 2 or so years playing live. I mainly play at pechanga so that might be the reason as well.. at almost every table I have played at there is at least 1 old lady that meets that description
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
[ QUOTE ]
Ca casinos are so full of rocks, lags, and old women that are doing poker to suplement their retirement checks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have never met a woman over 60 at Los Angeles card club who wasn't a full on fishy calling station. [/ QUOTE ] \ Have any of you guys played against that one jewish lady who plays at bike/huster/commerce... around 55 years old...plays 15-30 and above... bitches about getting cracked with qq when the flop shows aak... i forgot her name but every time i see her i try to get on her table...easy money. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vegas vs So Cal Casinos....
for middle limits (20/40 - 80/160) the vegas games are much softer and less aggressive and its not particularly close.
|
|
|