Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-14-2005, 05:48 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: 88: LRR from UTG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure there have been hands that were played worse in the history of poker.

I just cant think of any [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Your JJ hand against stinkypete? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

There's one worse hand I can remember. Some dude called down with J high. J HIGH!!!!!! LOLOLOLOL

[img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-14-2005, 05:55 PM
Nick C Nick C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,582
Default Re: 88: LRR from UTG

[ QUOTE ]
So we've established that the original preflop limp is not good. And that the postflop pretty much sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think the preflop limp is so bad. If someone decides to iso-raise me with JTs, I don't really mind that much.

However, I find myself raising 88/77 in EP more and more, and it would be my default play now at 5/10.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-14-2005, 06:00 PM
callmedonnie callmedonnie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder Bitch
Posts: 96
Default Re: 88: LRR from UTG

why the three bet? the hand was already HU, and value raising eights pf to me seems kind of odd.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.