![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
poker tracker calls me TA according to the autorate rules provided in FAQ. Is it bad or not? I've played only several thousands of hands, so i can't say am I a consistent winner or not.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TA will definitely be profitable at NL 25.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tight
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Straight-forward, ABC, TAG, (insert synonymous acronym).
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What are your actual numbers? VP$IP, PFR, aggr? If you're under 20% VP$IP you'll be fine.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
What are your actual numbers? VP$IP, PFR, aggr? If you're under 20% VP$IP you'll be fine. [/ QUOTE ] FULL ring: VPIP = 21.9 PFR = 7.67 WentSD = 19 6 max: VPIP = 18.87 PFR = 9.89 WentSD = 19.87 TA = 1.85 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I started running green in 25NL full ring when my VP$IP tightened in to about 22%, and it's lower now. (I remain a total hack, but I make money.) Selective postflop aggression is the other key though.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At low stake NL tables slightly loose aggressive is most profitable per table. You can of course play more tables at once if you are tighter..
see link http://www.andymcnish.btinternet.co.uk/newauto.htm I don't know where Skeme got the Full Ring NL autos in the FAQ's from (I did ask him but he didnt reply). So I've no idea what work has been done on them. His link to the 6 max rules though are to the TRodgers ones based on my full ring ones linked above so they should be solid enough (we both tested against 120,000 hand + databases over 50+ tweaks to match the data to the player types). |
![]() |
|
|