Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2005, 03:23 AM
bizaff bizaff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 97
Default Time to move up to the $100s?

At the $50 NLs:

My first 3500 hands:

-9.25 PTBB/100, VP$IP 18%, PFR 5.5%, Agg 2.93

My last 3000 hands:

+17.71 PTBB/100, VP$IP 18%, PFR 6.78%, Agg 3.73

I think I turned a lot of things around from the first group to the second group, most notably not making nearly as many bad calls. I also hear the $100 tables aren't much more difficult than the $50s. If I'm fairly certain this isn't just variance, and I have the roll for it, do I need to move up? Or do I need to make SURE it's not variance and get some more under my belt?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2005, 03:26 AM
Allinlife Allinlife is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Default Re: Time to move up to the $100s?

if you have the roll sure why not.

if not, then stay longer and play at least 5k more hands.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2005, 04:29 AM
Benholio Benholio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 238
Default Re: Time to move up to the $100s?

There is definitely some variance at work here. You don't go from a -9.25 PTBB/100 player to a +17.71 PTBB/100 player in 3000 hands. Seriously, one big hand can change your PTBB/100 stat by 5 points in a 3000 hand sample.

Having said that, though, go ahead and try the $100's if you are bankrolled for it and you can stand to lose a few hundred dollars if you start out running bad like your first 3500 hands.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2005, 04:59 AM
Spaded Spaded is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego County
Posts: 87
Default Re: Time to move up to the $100s?

I can tell by your VP$IP that you are playing full ring. They say that once you get up there in limits, 6max becomes much more profitable, and usually 6max is all that'll be available.
Why not move "up" to $50NL 6max?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2005, 11:51 AM
starvs starvs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Time to move up to the $100s?

I'm not an expert, but I don't think you can tell much from 3k hands. My first 3k hands of 25nl, after moving to ring games from SNGS, AA, KK, QQ, JJ, and AKs are all losers for me. Pretty sure that doesn't happen over a decent sample size.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2005, 12:13 PM
GoCubsGo GoCubsGo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pinning the tail
Posts: 283
Default Re: Time to move up to the $100s?

[ QUOTE ]
I can tell by your VP$IP that you are playing full ring. They say that once you get up there in limits, 6max becomes much more profitable, and usually 6max is all that'll be available.
Why not move "up" to $50NL 6max?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sort of considering that option myself, but after honing my full ring skills for so long with such effort, the task of learning a slightly different game is kind of overwhleming. Is there a guide for people converting to 6 max anywhere? That would save me a lot of trouble, such as learning the hard way that 98s is still marginal, even at 6 max.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.