Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2005, 12:27 AM
lastcoyote lastcoyote is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 23
Default I do this sometimes against TAG\'s and LAG\'s

Villain is likely a 2+2er: 26/16/2/3/2 after 700 datamined hands. No read. I've been at the table a few orbits and taken down a few pots w/o showing down due to sheer aggession.

Party Poker (6 max, 4 handed)

I open raise UTG with red queens. Button (2+2er) 3-bets, blinds fold, I cap.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

I bet, button calls.

Turn: T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

I check, button bets, I raise.

River: J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Bet, call.

Is there any reason to play this hand this way or am I just amusing myself (read tilt).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2005, 12:37 AM
mr pink mr pink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the wu, pa... bitches
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: I do this sometimes against TAG\'s and LAG\'s

i'll only do this if me and the villain have been going at it all night and it's clear he's out for revenge.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2005, 02:53 AM
joop joop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 65
Default Re: I do this sometimes against TAG\'s and LAG\'s

I think this play is pretty transparent, given that you capped UTG, you would usually bet this turn even if you only had overcards. If I was villian I would check it through just to get to showdown, even if I had top pair, because a CR is so likely. But by checking to him, you give him the option of a free card if he has a flush draw, or AK which has 6 outs against you. I would only use this play against an aggressive donk, not a thinking TAG, a river CR might be more appropriate against the latter.

Edit : Probably best to do this when your hand isn't vulnerable to overcards, and there are no logical draws villian could have, so if you have pocket aces or a set.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2005, 04:54 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I do this sometimes against TAG\'s and LAG\'s

I'm pretty sure this play will cost you money over time. Turn will be checked more than half the time with an observant 2+2er behind you, I don't care what his aggression stats are. If he has a big pair, or just hit AT, you're getting raised on the turn anyway and paid on the river after you 3 bet. Why lose the extra big bet in those cases as well?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2005, 07:59 AM
setjes setjes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 114
Default Re: I do this sometimes against TAG\'s and LAG\'s

I don't like this against a TAG/2+2er. It will get checked through too often. Besides, when u c/r most of 'm will fold. I do this almost always when I'm upto a bet-when-checked-to LAG (the 60/30/2 types). They often call this down with little cuz they suspect a bluff when u play it this way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.