free will

[chomsky53]

yall are correct. i should have taken your charges that the conclusion would have to be inconsistent more seriously. this is my fault. i think im my ambition not to give up the game i made the game hopelessly vague. premises 235 can be revised everything else i said stands.
1.) determinism is true
2.) if determinism is true it shows that people are not free.
3.) in order for us to have morality we must be able to think of each other as free
4.) i want to vindicate morality in my answer to the questions below
5.) because i believe determinism is true and because of my belief in premise 2-4 i now need to have sufficient reason think of individuals as free in order to vindicate morality.

again im sorry. these revisions offer sufficient clarification in order to say what form the answer must take. again denying the premises is not the point.