#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Convince me this is a misclick and not collusion ($22)
Some people are just donks. I had both blinds fold to my button push of 450 chips the other day...at 200/400 blinds.
Suffice to say, collusion isn't the most likely explanation for this. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Convince me this is a misclick and not collusion ($22)
I doubt this is collusion. It's more than likely the guy is a donk who got dealt something like 23o and he just has no concept of pot odds.
I also highly doubt the guy purposely kept the other player alive. This is a $20 tournament. 99% of people at the 20s don't think to use strategies like this. And FWIW, I don't understand you people defending the play and saying it's a good idea to keep the small stack alive. I think that's a terrible idea. If you pass him those 500 chips for free, he's now got about 1400; that's far from trivial and enough to put a good dent in you. If you can take him out, however, you go heads up with 7,000 chips vs. 3,000 chips. That's a great situation. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Convince me this is a misclick and not collusion ($22)
nh sir
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Convince me this is a misclick and not collusion ($22)
Starting stacks:
[ QUOTE ] Seat 6: ryan1131 (t3000) Seat 8: vpaces (t6330) Seat 9: jakeopes (t670) [/ QUOTE ] Stacks if vpaces folds: [ QUOTE ] Seat 6: ryan1131 (t2750) Seat 8: vpaces (t5830) Seat 9: jakeopes (t1420) [/ QUOTE ] Stacks if vpaces calls and loses: [ QUOTE ] Seat 6: ryan1131 (t2750) Seat 8: vpaces (t5680) Seat 9: jakeopes (t1590) [/ QUOTE ] Stacks if vpaces calls and wins: [ QUOTE ] Seat 6: ryan1131 (t2750) Seat 8: vpaces (t7250) Seat 9: jakeopes (t0) [/ QUOTE ] Yeah... that's a bad, bad, fold. It may be FPS, it's probably not understanding pot odds, but unlikely collusion. |
|
|