Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:24 PM
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3
Default Small pair against a maniac

Say you're heads up against a maniac. He plays 80%+ of his hands for a raise. You've got a small pair, say pocket 3s.

Do you simply call down every time? Do you fold truly awful flops (say 9TJ all of a suit you don't have)

What non-set flops do you raise? Any flop with a pair or an undercard, making you a favorite over his more likely to be unpaired hand?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:32 PM
peterchi peterchi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Delaware/Michigan/Baltimore
Posts: 150
Default Re: Small pair against a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
Say you're heads up against a maniac. He plays 80%+ of his hands for a raise. You've got a small pair, say pocket 3s.

Do you simply call down every time? Do you fold truly awful flops (say 9TJ all of a suit you don't have)

What non-set flops do you raise? Any flop with a pair or an undercard, making you a favorite over his more likely to be unpaired hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm assuming you've got it heads up on the flop.

And that we're against a true, true maniac. 80% PFR seems like a lot. So yeah.

I'd raise just about any flop. Especially low paired ones, but that should be relatively obvious. Yeah 9TJs sounds like a flop I might slow down on.

I've been known to call down maniacs with Ace-high. And win. So yeah, I'd probably call down just about any board with 33. Unless I was playing the board.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2005, 01:52 PM
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3
Default Re: Small pair against a maniac

The problem with raising any flop is that his two random overcard hands are not a big dog to you. You have zero fold equity and he's going to make a pair about half the time.

What I am thinking about is which boards make it more or less likely for the little pair to beat overcards.

Obviously, any board with an undercard or a pair on it makes it less likely that you are beat. And boards with flush and straight possibilities are going to beat you more than boards without draw possibilities.

I guess the question I need to answer is: Given a flop of Ts 9c 7s, what are the odds of a random hand beating your pocket 3s?

This was a true maniac. I called him down with Queen high once and was good. He lost about $500 playing 3-6 (6 max)in about 2 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:12 PM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: Small pair against a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
I guess the question I need to answer is: Given a flop of Ts 9c 7s, what are the odds of a random hand beating your pocket 3s?

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's truly a random hand, which it sounds like it is against this guy, then the odds of him beating you do not really change with any flop that doesn't directly help your hand. Against a somewhat normal aggressive player, you could expect a flop like that to decrease your chances of winning somewhat, but since he could be playing any 2 cards this way you can't infer anything.

To answer your question, I'm calling down every time with a pocket pair (again, unless I end up playing the board on the river...and even then I'll call if the board is a straight or flush or something). I'm not going to raise at any point with such a weak hand because I know he's not folding, but I'm not folding either.

This is true of any made hand vs. a maniac, btw. Except that I'm obviously raising a lot with a stronger made hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:27 PM
callmedonnie callmedonnie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder Bitch
Posts: 96
Default Re: Small pair against a maniac

I got into this situation last night a few times with a maniac. Sometimes it was with AK and also with small pocket pairs. Anyway, I found myself taking this line with him. In position I raised the flop UI, called his lead on both turn and river. It was HU and obviously more info would be needed for specific hand, but this worked alright. The first three hands he took my $, and in three more hands I won it back and then some. I used this line twice with AK UI and he showed K2 UI, and the other time I had a small pocket pair.
I think this line works in both spots.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:36 PM
chief444 chief444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 211
Default Re: Small pair against a maniac

If his hand is truly random, I'm capping most flops anyway. But whatever you do DON'T FOLD.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2005, 04:55 PM
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3
Default Re: Small pair against a maniac

This isn't really true, though. Obviously, a board of 22444 is going to make your pocket threes a very likely winner compared to 6789A with 4 of a suit you don't have. On a paired board, the random hand is less likely to have made a pair. On a board with a 4-straight, a four flush, and five unpaired cards, you are very likely to be a loser against a random hand, since he'll have a flush about a third of the time, and any 5,6,7,8,9,T or A beats you.

[ QUOTE ]
If it's truly a random hand, which it sounds like it is against this guy, then the odds of him beating you do not really change with any flop that doesn't directly help your hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.