Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-22-2005, 03:12 PM
magates magates is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

[ QUOTE ]

On the flop you're getting 18:1, safe, drawing to a 2-outer (you have no backdoor draws). You can't continue just to see the turn (2/47 = 22:1, about). If you count going all the way to the river, let's assume that the betting pattern will be the same, and let's say you'll lose one more opponent; so, when it gets to you the pot'll be 12.5 BB, so you'll be spending 1.5 bets to win 12, or 8:1, and your pot odds are 2/47 + 2/46 = ~10:1. Am I right so far?

[/ QUOTE ]

From the flop to the river it's (1/1-(45/47)(44/46))-1 = 10.9:1
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-22-2005, 04:22 PM
Eeegah Eeegah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Raising 99 and flopping quads
Posts: 609
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

I think I've been misreading ratio notation all this time; I've always thought it to be equivalent to a fraction, as in (outs)possibilities), but I guess it's actually different. Anyone know how this difference evolved?

Moreover, if a coinflip is 1:1, then what's something that's guaranteed to win, 1:0?

To be honest, I really don't like ratio notation anyway, as it's confusing to convert it to and from a figure that you can actually do math with, like fractions or percentages. I think I need to start a campaign or write my Representative or something.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-22-2005, 09:47 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

[ QUOTE ]
From the flop to the river it's (1/1-(45/47)(44/46))-1 = 10.9:1

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right, it's closer to 11:1. Your intended formula and mine are just different ways of arriving at the same number. That said, I used the word "intended" because (1/1-x)-1=-x. You need a few more parentheses.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-22-2005, 10:05 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

[ QUOTE ]
Hero is dealt KK UTG.
Hero raises, folded to Niners Jersey (MP) who calls, SB calls, BB calls.

Qxx rainbow flop. Hero bets, Niners Jersey raises, SB calls, BB folds, Hero calls.

Turn pairs the board and improves Hero to a boat.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's one magical turn card.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:06 AM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

Did I mention that I suck at math? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Either way, I like the flop call & would like it all the way down to 14:1.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:31 AM
magates magates is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

[ QUOTE ]
You're right, it's closer to 11:1. Your intended formula and mine are just different ways of arriving at the same number. That said, I used the word "intended" because (1/1-x)-1=-x. You need a few more parentheses.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oops. Yeah, I should be more careful. That said, your formula for calculating the odds of making a draw with two cards to come is wrong and won't arrive at the same number. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-23-2005, 01:53 AM
SlantNGo SlantNGo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 133
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hero is dealt KK UTG.
Hero raises, folded to Niners Jersey (MP) who calls, SB calls, BB calls.

Qxx rainbow flop. Hero bets, Niners Jersey raises, SB calls, BB folds, Hero calls.

Turn pairs the board and improves Hero to a boat.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's one magical turn card.

[/ QUOTE ]

Whoops! KQx flop.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:54 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Chasing my set (implied odds question)

[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure it doesn't much matter to harv, but it's important that this doesn't get confusing for people newer to the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good looking out for us. Great basic explanation on odds--I'm getting to that part in TOP now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.