#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KT hand (fixed now)
Yeah, it's a factor for sure. Like all things in poker it's a question of "Often enough?" but it definitely is a factor.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KT hand (fixed now)
[ QUOTE ]
I'm probably too much on the side of NOT bluffing enough... but in 2000 hands I have NEVER bluff check-raised the river. Not ONCE. My buddy, who plays very aggressively (I call him a tight maniac), has check-raised the river 20 times in 25,000 hands. Of those, ONE was a bluff. You can check this out for yourselves by going into your PT, "General Info" tab, "Filters", then bottom left hand corner "Check raised river". Click ok. How many show up as bluffs? Post your stats. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] FWIW. [/ QUOTE ] In the 5,000 hands that I have in PT I checkraised the river only 7 times and never with less than two pair. My aggression factor is 2.7 so I'm not overly weak, and I do use bluffs at times against the right opponents. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KT hand (fixed now)
If the KT were suited, and table same otherwise, would you still discourage the raise? Guess w/suited, you want more callers to give you the right odds, but I'm curious.
Thx. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KT hand (fixed now)
Suited it's a raise because your hand equity is higher.
I think limping vs. raising here with KTo is fairly close given who was in front of me. I think a lot depends on who is sitting in the blinds, is that correct DeathDonkey? |
|
|