|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: is the signifigance of this relationship age dependent? | |||
| there is little or no correlation between attractiveness and people skills |
   
|
14 | 25.00% |
| attractiveness- P-skills relationship, most signifigant for 26-45 year olds |
  
|
15 | 26.79% |
| attractivness-P-skills relationship, most signifigant for 10-25 year olds |
  
|
17 | 30.36% |
| age does not affect the correlation between attractivness and people skills |
  
|
9 | 16.07% |
| attractiveness- P-skills relationship, most signifigant for 46+ year olds |
  
|
1 | 1.79% |
| Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
08-13-2005, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
You're probably right about just calling the river, but I would imagine these 5.50 players turn over some serious bullshit. Having said that I still think you're probably right. I was surprised he had a 2, people at that level don't usually lead trips. AT is a possibility. I don't know, now I'm thinking you can push the river again. It's closer than you're making it out to be. Raising the flop seems really dumb to me unless you have a read, which you don't. What information do you need? He led into you when you raised preflop and you have A high, you're probably beat. If you're not he's probably drawing to 3 outs, and he's not folding much that you're behind on this board at the 5.50's.
|
|
#14
08-16-2005, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK first hand - did I screw up?
i think you shoulda raised the turn.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
