Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2005, 02:39 PM
Danenania Danenania is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 13
Default 98o - Standardish?

Party Poker 10/20 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, MP calls, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls, MP calls.

Flop: (8.50 SB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG checks, MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG folds, MP calls, Button calls.

Turn: (7.25 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero folds...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:25 PM
Danenania Danenania is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 13
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

Yeah?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:27 PM
Apocalypse Apocalypse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 109
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

YEAH!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:27 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

I usually just peel one here on the flop. JT and [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] are calling two cold anyways, so you're really only protecting yourself from an 8 with a worse kicker.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:29 PM
setjes setjes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 114
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

Nice try, but I think at least somebody has the ace too often to make this work out good for you (supposing he won't fold it). Besides, you will often get 3bet, what kinda sucks. I just think this play is better for something like a K-high flop. When MP calls 2 cold and the K falls on the turn ur pretty much done here, so good fold.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:30 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

I probably check/call, then check/fold the turn UI. This line isn't bad, the problem is that it's a coordinated flop, and you'd have to keep hammering to the river. A flush draw sticks around, T9 or even JT probably sticks around, and if they call your flop bet and you check the turn then they could bet out again and you'll be folding the best hand. On the other hand, in the line you chose you're only paying one more SB, while increasing the chance that you win the hand against something like KQ or KJ or whatnot. But a button raise after limpers . . . that's probably a good-sized pocket or an ace, not KQ. The way most players play.

Which raises the question: If the turn is a blank, would you have led out? If the turn is a K but the MP didn't overcall on the flop, would you lead out?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:34 PM
Apocalypse Apocalypse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 109
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

[ QUOTE ]
I usually just peel one here on the flop. JT and are calling two cold anyways, so you're really only protecting yourself from an 8 with a worse kicker.

[/ QUOTE ]

and a lot of other crap people mistakenly call with in such a pot that is higher than an 8? checkcalling this flop in ep with this pot in the middle i guess one could consider as drawing for 2pair or a set or a redraw. You dont have odds for doing so. For me that leaves just the option for folding/checkraising. I don't see much harm in choosing either of those, so my read would be decisive.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:43 PM
PassiveCaller PassiveCaller is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

I think calling is better, since you're going to end up check-folding and not firing again on almost every turn and he'll often interpret that as a flush draw or some draw and bet again and it's like giving him an extra SB.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:45 PM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

I would fold pre flop and call the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:53 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: 98o - Standardish?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I usually just peel one here on the flop. JT and are calling two cold anyways, so you're really only protecting yourself from an 8 with a worse kicker.

[/ QUOTE ]

and a lot of other crap people mistakenly call with in such a pot that is higher than an 8? checkcalling this flop in ep with this pot in the middle i guess one could consider as drawing for 2pair or a set or a redraw. You dont have odds for doing so. For me that leaves just the option for folding/checkraising. I don't see much harm in choosing either of those, so my read would be decisive.

[/ QUOTE ]

"A lot of crap" Even someone calling with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] x[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] here isn't far behind you.

Nor is Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

My point is Bad hands generally won't call two cold here but good ones (AKA ones that have you beat) will
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.