|
|
|
|
#1
08-12-2005, 12:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Crazy Poker perposterous bonus
Whats wrong with 1/3rd of a rake rebate. Even the dumbass donaters will love a free 200 a month.......
|
|
#2
08-12-2005, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Crazy Poker perposterous bonus
[ QUOTE ]
Whats wrong with 1/3rd of a rake rebate. Even the dumbass donaters will love a free 200 a month....... [/ QUOTE ] This is whats wrong with it... Old way - 700 raked hands = $100. (~900 total hands 50NL or 100NL) New way - 4533 hands at 100NL = $61.38 in rakeback (7385 hands at this rate = $100) New way - 5423 hands at 50NL = $53.13 in rakeback (10207 hands at this rate = $100) These are based on my own stats playing full-ring NL with a fairly tight VP$IP (15-17). A looser player or 6-max player might get better results, but you see my point.
|
|
#3
08-12-2005, 01:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Crazy Poker perposterous bonus
Okay if your going to run and hide it sucks. But if you want to play the soft Prima games it's great. The only problem they could become tough if too many rocks gravitate for the rake...
|
|
#4
08-12-2005, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Crazy Poker perposterous bonus
[ QUOTE ]
Okay if your going to run and hide it sucks. But if you want to play the soft Prima games it's great. The only problem they could become tough if too many rocks gravitate for the rake... [/ QUOTE ] Not sure what you are talking about, running and hiding. I've played 10k+ hands on Prima network in the last month, and I do enjoy the games. This doesn't change the fact that this rakeback deal sucks compared to having a one-day clearable $100 which allows me to spend more time playing on other skins/networks collecting various bonuses and the like.
|
|
#5
08-12-2005, 09:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Crazy Poker perposterous bonus
[ QUOTE ]
This is whats wrong with it... Old way - 700 raked hands = $100. (~900 total hands 50NL or 100NL) New way - 4533 hands at 100NL = $61.38 in rakeback (7385 hands at this rate = $100) New way - 5423 hands at 50NL = $53.13 in rakeback (10207 hands at this rate = $100) These are based on my own stats playing full-ring NL with a fairly tight VP$IP (15-17). A looser player or 6-max player might get better results, but you see my point. [/ QUOTE ] This is the exact reason I am dissapointed as well. I play 25-50NL and the rake earned isn't nearly worth the time spent as it makes more sense to be playing under a bonus instead at such low limits.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
