A thousand words to think about

natedogg · #1 08-09-2005, 01:24 AM

squeek12 · #2 08-09-2005, 03:17 AM

excuse my stupidity, but who is the woman in the pic?

Slinky · #3 08-09-2005, 07:22 AM

Madeleine Korbel Albright, 64th U.S. Secretary of State

Slinky · #4 08-09-2005, 07:30 AM

Shaking Hands: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein greets Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy of President Ronald Reagan, in Baghdad on December 20, 1983.

"The intelligence indicated that Iraq used chemical weapons against Iranian forces, and, according to a November 1983 memo, against "Kurdish insurgents" as well"

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

BadBoyBenny · #5 08-09-2005, 08:04 AM

FishHooks · #6 08-09-2005, 08:41 AM

No wonder Clinton had her in his cabinet, he wouldn't be temped to sleep with that woman. Heh just kidding.

mackthefork · #7 08-09-2005, 08:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
No wonder Clinton had her in his cabinet, he wouldn't be temped to sleep with that woman.

[/ QUOTE ]

No kidding.

[ QUOTE ]
Heh just kidding.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh wait n/m, you weren't though, right?

Mack

Roybert · #8 08-09-2005, 10:01 AM

You do know that Donald Rumsfeld sold North Korea their nuclear reactors, right (if you can trust that 'liberal' rag Fortune magazine)?

http://www.fortune.com/fortune/articles/0,15114,447429,00.html

I can't get the link to work so please copy and paste it into your browser if you'd like to see it.

bobman0330 · #9 08-09-2005, 10:16 AM

[ QUOTE ]
You do know that Donald Rumsfeld sold North Korea their nuclear reactors, right (if you can trust that 'liberal' rag Fortune magazine)?

http://www.fortune.com/fortune/articles/0,15114,447429,00.html

I can't get the link to work so please copy and paste it into your browser if you'd like to see it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that link is fixed.

Your post, however, makes no sense. Rumsfeld's company was providing the reactors in accordance with BILL CLINTON's 1994 Agreed Framework.

Furthermore, reactors of the type provided under the Agreed Framework cannot be used to produce weapons-grade plutonium without substantial technical expertise.

A link that works

Thirdly, and lastly, that article was in no way objective, and did not appear to have any facts to bring to light, just meaningless coincidences and insinuation.