Males Shaving Body Hair - Page 4

Indiana · #31 08-08-2005, 04:40 PM

Ok, I'm about to get kinda honest here...Wait no I'm not, end of post.

Indy

Dex · #32 08-08-2005, 04:45 PM

Apply this, then use this.

End of thread.

Indiana · #33 08-08-2005, 04:51 PM

Ok, deal is I was a state champion 135 pound wrestler in high school. Only problem is, I was 168lbs regular weight after football season. So after fasting and spitting for a week and running around in trash bags I was usually still around a quarter pound or so short. Make a long story short, all body hair had to go. And I mean ALL body hair. Shaved my head, arms, legs and the piece. I was pretty ok for about a week when the itch set in. Man I was in agony for like a month till that chit grew back. Till this day I'm still asking myself, was the city-county title worth all that? I guess I'll sit with sup bro some day and reminisce.

Indy

morgan180 · #34 08-08-2005, 05:02 PM

[ QUOTE ]
shaving anything other than your face/head is unacceptable on all levels and it is not close

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm....if you're down for stinky 60s love then i guess this works. but if you're not on acid, with a flower in your hair, and living in a hippie colony, then its just wrong.

jakethebake · #35 08-08-2005, 05:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shaving anything other than your face/head is unacceptable on all levels and it is not close

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm....if you're down for stinky 60s love then i guess this works. but if you're not on acid, with a flower in your hair, and living in a hippie colony, then its just wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you're not a metrosexual little pooty boy then it's clearly correct.

siccjay · #36 08-08-2005, 05:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
keeping your pubic hair at least tidy is a no brainer.

[/ QUOTE ]

If by that you mean, leave it alone, then yes.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are old. If you had even the slightest chance at getting some strange, you would want to keep your [censored] trimmed.

morgan180 · #37 08-08-2005, 05:12 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shaving anything other than your face/head is unacceptable on all levels and it is not close

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm....if you're down for stinky 60s love then i guess this works. but if you're not on acid, with a flower in your hair, and living in a hippie colony, then its just wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you're not a metrosexual little pooty boy then it's clearly correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, i'm sure your wife would choose picking through your sweaty dreadlocks instead of dealing with your well groomed area. think of it this way, would you be stoked to go down on your wife and see buckwheat in a leg lock? i hope not - so return the favor, she'll thank you for it.

WSUchica · #38 08-08-2005, 06:00 PM

For me it's a tossup between trimmed and shaved

Shaved legs/arms freak me out on guys

Love some chest hair and LOVE a 9'oclock shadow

Excess chest/ass/back hair is nasty

peachy · #39 08-08-2005, 06:05 PM

gross...i prefer no chest hair and little to none down there...and definately none on the arse

gulebjorn · #40 08-08-2005, 06:12 PM

Taken from the best page in the universe :

[ QUOTE ]
Metrosexual: A gay guy still in the closet. This word is so contemptible that even the man who coined it has since apologized for being such a douche. I cringe every time I hear this word.

Retrosexual: This word wouldn't exist if "metro" didn't happen to rhyme with "retro." It's supposed to mean the opposite of a "metrosexual," which makes it another superfluous word since we already have a word for the opposite of a metrosexual called "straight."

[/ QUOTE ]