#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Stack AA Hand at PP 100NL (6-max)
one of those times where you have a hand you want to show down, but a raise would make you puke...that makes this an easy check behind....pot is big enuff anyways. If I bet anything at that pot it's half pot, not full pot. I generally adhere pretty closely to the pot, 2/3 pot, half pot rule on these type hands.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Stack AA Hand at PP 100NL (6-max)
i really don't think that was the point. You posted a highly read dependent hand that happened to work out, and disregarded the normal advice for this situation by relying on your "they think i'm crazy read." I think your point was to brag about a $660 pot actually. Nice hand, but if I was the villain in this hand, you wouldn't be getting that stack back, you'd have been behind on that river....hell against most donks you lose that river. People can't fold AA all the time, sometimes they still win, most of the time they lose their stack.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Stack AA Hand at PP 100NL (6-max)
[ QUOTE ]
I think your point was to brag about a $660 pot actually. [/ QUOTE ] If I wanted to find a $600+ pot to brag about winning I could surely find a better one that this. This one was pretty ugly and doesn't make me look like the sharpest tool in the shed. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
|