Software I would pay for! (session reviewing)

[Petro]

The ability to see look at all the hands were I've been CRed would be excellent. I also like all of the options that BZ mentioned.

[pokergrader]

[ QUOTE ]
I would like it to actually do board analysis in a sense.

Like,
"Hero has overcards"
"Hero has no 4flush"
"Hero has no 4straight."
"Hero has mid pair"
"Hero raised preflop"
"Hero is bet into (donked)"

etc

I'm gonna spend some time and think of some more options. Do you think these would be possible?


Thanks for taking the time to look into this, btw.

[/ QUOTE ]

All of these are pretty trivial. The real difficulty is changing PGC from just parsing the hands to actually understanding the content of the hands, but this shouldn't be too hard because PokerGrader does it and I can just recycle that code.

Just keep listing things you want.

[pokergrader]

Just an update:

Im about halfway through updating it, and I should be able to release it towards the end of this week.

If everything works out, it should be able to filter hands to as general or specific a situation you want with quite a few criteria.

[Luv2DriveTT]

[ QUOTE ]
Well for the first time in around a month I have an entire weekend to myself, so if you can give me a full list of filters you want, I can work on making it happen.

They dont have to be specific situations, but specific filters that could be combined to find the specific situations you want.

[/ QUOTE ]

First things first... add SQL support or it's worthless to many of us.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[pokergrader]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well for the first time in around a month I have an entire weekend to myself, so if you can give me a full list of filters you want, I can work on making it happen.

They dont have to be specific situations, but specific filters that could be combined to find the specific situations you want.

[/ QUOTE ]

First things first... add SQL support or it's worthless to many of us.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Just a quick question, what % of PT users have switched over to SQL. Is it like 50%, 70%, 90%? I know you cant quote exact numbers, but I've been a little disconnected from the community for the last month and have no idea how popular the SQL version is, so any ballpark number will help.

[theRealMacoy]

[ QUOTE ]

First things first... add SQL support or it's worthless to many of us.



[/ QUOTE ]

[zerosum]

[ QUOTE ]
Just a quick question, what % of PT users have switched over to SQL. Is it like 50%, 70%, 90%?

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's over 50%, I'd be surprised.

[pokergrader]

This has been more challenging than I expected, but at this point I'm almost done. Above is a current screenshot, and I think I can get a beta version of it out in a couple days.

I don't have any of your software but after seeing that screenshot, I am reconsidering. That looks good. Very nice.

[TXTiger]

How about:
Limped after x limpers with xx

I tried doing this myself but it was so time consuming manually that I decided to just play poker instead. I'd like to know how 22 does after 1 or 2 limpers and how 97s does after 2 or 3 limpers.