![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
there's no way they could afford to pay me as much as it would take to move away from Party etc
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 70-80% is not realistic. The sites would be losing money at that rate. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, no, they'd be making 20-30%. [/ QUOTE ] LOL...Oh, so the sites are making 100% profit off us?? I guess they have no server, site, licensing, employment, or affiliate costs in their business. A business without ANY overhead...that must be great! [/ QUOTE ] A site could still profitably do 70%. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That depends on the site in question and their operating costs. There are many sites that would not turn a profit if they gave 70% away.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good luck with the campaign. Can you included online tournies as well as WSOP some of us can't easily play live.
I'd play a lot at pokerstars if they gave me 30%+ rakeback available to enter their own tournies. Cash would be even better. chez |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
there's no way they could afford to pay me as much as it would take to move away from Party etc [/ QUOTE ] |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok. I'm not looking for big dollar tournament buy-ins. I would definitely prefer the cash. Dedicating myself to a high-volume hand requirement without at least some flexibility will probably keep me from entertaining new offers, and I'll probably just stick with existing rakeback options.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cash please.
I like the sliding rakeback scale idea... quite motivating if it were designed appropriately. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
there's no way they could afford to pay me as much as it would take to move away from Party etc [/ QUOTE ] Well, a major caveat is that the games would have to be soft for me to be interested. This is why I proposed my idea at Stars, where I've found the 6-max games to be of Charmin-like quality. You couldn't pay me to play in a rock garden. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
30% rakeback
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
30% rakeback [/ QUOTE ] Let me just say that 30% rakeback is gay. If you're a true high-volume player, you should already be getting that (or more) on the Party Skins. Therefore, the deal would have to be much more lucrative than "30% rakeback" to get many of us to leave Party et al. No offense. |
![]() |
|
|