#1
|
|||
|
|||
Varience at its best...
Let me start out by saying this is NOT a bad beat post (or a post complaining about a series of bad beats for that matter). I know I am new to the forum but I am trying to fit in [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]. Keep in mind that I do understand varience and I have no control over the swings.
As I continue my downswing for the last 40 games, I thought I would post a little graphic for you all to see. I know that 70 games is a very small sample size, but darn is this normal? have you had much worse swings? Can you tell me a bad swing story so I can feel better about myself? (It will help me play my A game during rough times). My SNG Tracker stats: ROI -10% ITM 30% $/tourney -$1.14 I play strictly $10+1 games. Thank for the help!! TheWeakling |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
...I lost $3000 over 96 games today...be happy.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
This is nothing and you don't even have a samplesize.
I went -ROI for over 250 sngs at 10+1 and i know people have been on the negative side for more than 1000 sngs. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
are these your first 70 games?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
Yes. However I have been playing SNG games elsewhere for nearly 5 months.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
[ QUOTE ]
This is nothing and you don't even have a samplesize. I went -ROI for over 250 sngs at 10+1 and i know people have been on the negative side for more than 1000 sngs. [/ QUOTE ] why is it that when people lose for x games they never ever think that they might be a losing player instead of just "on the negative side"? citanul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
[ QUOTE ]
This is nothing and you don't even have a samplesize. I went -ROI for over 250 sngs at 10+1 and i know people have been on the negative side for more than 1000 sngs. [/ QUOTE ] Probably because they are a long term losing player, and you very well may be too. You know, most people are. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
I've lost my last 14 SNGs (a new record for me!) and 25 of my last 28.
Varience is a bitch. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is nothing and you don't even have a samplesize. I went -ROI for over 250 sngs at 10+1 and i know people have been on the negative side for more than 1000 sngs. [/ QUOTE ] why is it that when people lose for x games they never ever think that they might be a losing player instead of just "on the negative side"? citanul [/ QUOTE ] I know I am because I'm a long term winner at 109s Didn't raptor say he had -ROI for over 1000 sngs at the 109s? or am I making things up? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Varience at its best...
maybe I should have stated that I didn't mean 1k SNGs at 11s
|
|
|