|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
1 - 7.78% 2 - 14.17% 3 - 16.94% and make sure you get ITM when you're on the bubble. Like if you're in the top 4, and 1 guy has a similar chipcount to you, concentrate on him getting out first at all costs. I sometimes will play supertight if it looks like it improves my ITM chance. You can definately improve your ITM a few percent at least. [/ QUOTE ] Connect the dots. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
deleted: misread post
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
I play typical 2+2 on the bubble. No folding ITM for me. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe you don't wanna play weak like me and sneak in the money with a short stack, but you can do better than 36% ITM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
but you can do better than 36% ITM. [/ QUOTE ] I think you are too focused on ITM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1 - 7.78% 2 - 14.17% 3 - 16.94% and make sure you get ITM when you're on the bubble. Like if you're in the top 4, and 1 guy has a similar chipcount to you, concentrate on him getting out first at all costs. I sometimes will play supertight if it looks like it improves my ITM chance. You can definately improve your ITM a few percent at least. [/ QUOTE ] Connect the dots. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, you think I should play more agressively with 4-5 left so I don't go ITM with such a small stack? I'm getting that feeling too. I need to work on my shorthanded play as well though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 1 - 7.78% 2 - 14.17% 3 - 16.94% and make sure you get ITM when you're on the bubble. Like if you're in the top 4, and 1 guy has a similar chipcount to you, concentrate on him getting out first at all costs. I sometimes will play supertight if it looks like it improves my ITM chance. You can definately improve your ITM a few percent at least. [/ QUOTE ] Connect the dots. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, you think I should play more agressively with 4-5 left so I don't go ITM with such a small stack? I'm getting that feeling too. I need to work on my shorthanded play as well though. [/ QUOTE ] Could be a mix of not gaining enough chips on the bubble and not playing correct while in the money. But you definately need to fix it because if you don't increase the number of 1st you will never be able to increase your ROI to good numbers. A first is worth so much money that you have to give yourself the chance to win it. Of course there are odd times where you have no option but to try to limp into 3rd but that is not the ordinary. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
I'm crushing 10+1 and I had -ROI for 250 SNGs (with 35% ITM). I don't see how you can evaluate someones game after only 200.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
I don't see how you could have a negative ROI for 250 games if you are "crushing" the $10+ 1's. Maybe you weren't crushing them then?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how you could have a negative ROI for 250 games if you are "crushing" the $10+ 1's. Maybe you weren't crushing them then? [/ QUOTE ] I had a stretch of 200 games at the 11s where I had a negative ROI (-7%). This was immediately followed by a stretch of 200 games where I was up 110 buy-ins (55% ROI). Variance happens. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how you could have a negative ROI for 250 games if you are "crushing" the $10+ 1's. Maybe you weren't crushing them then? [/ QUOTE ] Then I'd venture to say you don't have enough experience playing SNG's yet. If you define crushing as 20% ROI you'll still get runs like that. be well |
|
|