AKs - 600 NL PP

[Garland]

[ QUOTE ]
Because of your stack size I normally lead this flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Leading the flop is not the answer. You'll only get blown off the nut flush draw when the aggressive button raises, and the board provides no reason for tight big stacked villian to believe his hand still isn't good.

Check-call the flop and check-fold the turn unimproved.

Garland

[thabadguy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because of your stack size I normally lead this flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Leading the flop is not the answer. You'll only get blown off the nut flush draw when the aggressive button raises, and the board provides no reason for tight big stacked villian to believe his hand still isn't good.

Check-call the flop and check-fold the turn unimproved.

Garland

[/ QUOTE ]
I think this is very weak.

[Sadat X]

[ QUOTE ]
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because of your stack size I normally lead this flop.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Leading the flop is not the answer. You'll only get blown off the nut flush draw when the aggressive button raises, and the board provides no reason for tight big stacked villian to believe his hand still isn't good.

Check-call the flop and check-fold the turn unimproved.

Garland


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I think this is very weak.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think if you want to take the aggressive route, the best play is to lead for about $50 and make a big reraise if he comes over the top. I don't think this is bad play if your opponent is capable of folding a big pair on the flop.

[Stormwolf]

He has 48% equity against a range of JJ+, 47% for QQ+, even for KK+ its 41%, throw in some AK AQs or TT it makes an easy lead get raised push