Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2003, 02:51 PM
Philuva Philuva is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 335
Default Opening in LP vs. Playing Short Handed

Do you treat the situation where it is folded to you in the CO in a 10 handed game the same as when you are UTG in a 4 handed game? Why or why not?

I have noticed while positionally you are the same, the 3 players remaining to act in the shorthanded game will play much looser than the 3 players remaining to act in the 10-handed game.

Also, does the fact that 6 players have already folded to you in the 10 handed game change your starting hand requirments because you know they most likely folded low cards?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2003, 10:00 PM
Ginogino Ginogino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 334
Default Re: Opening in LP vs. Playing Short Handed

Phil:
My understanding of the basic math is that there is very little difference between being folded to in the cutoff in a 10-player game and being UTG in a 4-player game.

In practice, though, there is a difference in the way the two games play (a bigger difference at lower limits which gets smaller as the stakes get higher/players get better). This is mostly a result of players who don't like shorthanded poker and who don't make sufficient adjustments for shorthanded-ness. Because they don't appreciate enough the difference the reduced number of opponents makes, they wait for stronger hands than necessary to open-raise with, and/or they play passively when they should be aggressive. They also often play the wrong hands (middle suited connectors versus two broadway cards, for instance). This affects the play of everyone else.

At the limits at which I usually play, though, you don't have to worry about getting folded to in the cutoff very much.

Gino
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2003, 05:47 PM
Louie Landale Louie Landale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,277
Default Re: Opening in LP vs. Playing Short Handed

If memory serves I did some math a few years ago and concluded that if everyone is "playing by the book" then 7 players folding will increase the chances of a remaining player having an Ace by only 10%. Thus, the "bunching factor" isn't very relevant. Loose players folder, especially those that will play any Ace, increases the chances of an opponent having an Ace by quite a bit.

Anyway, "yes": its the number of players remaining the matters, very little on how many have folded. 4 handed UTG CO is the same as 10 handed CO after 7 players folded.

But you are also correct that players actually play differently making it much harder to steal in short handed games. Actually, they play too tight in the blinds against late position steals in a full game and usually end up playing more realistically in short handed games.

- Louie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2003, 09:24 AM
beetman beetman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 71
Default Re: Opening in LP vs. Playing Short Handed

My experience and simulations agree with your findings that clumping is not terribly significant. Another factor is that even mediocre Hold'em players often fold crappy offsuit aces. In early position I only play about 30% of the hands that contain an ace, and I'm not that tight.

However, in Omaha/8 the clumping factor is a lot more significant.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.